Reading the bottom of p.79, Cameron stops Bob on a single word: if the Quadrivium is “a higher level type of tactility,” then tactility cannot be something that “changes with time” . From that objection the session builds Bob’s decade chart of Marshall McLuhan — the 1940s Trivium, the 1950s Quadrivium, the 1960s Satellite-and-Cyborg anti-environment — and runs out past the chart to the Android Meme, the Five Bodies, and the Tech Body . Under all of it is the question the two keep circling: McLuhan named what media do but “didn’t figure out how to communicate it” , a glorious failure Cameron sets himself, and Bob, to finish.

Key Topics

  • Tactility recast as interplay rather than a sense — “McLuhan defines it as interplay” — against Cameron’s counter that the Quadrivium is a higher level of tactility, not tactility changing over time.
  • Bob’s decade chart: the 1940s Trivium plus Advertising and Comics, the 1950s Quadrivium (three Copernican Revolutions, non-Euclidean Geometry, Nielsen Ratings), and the 1960s Quadrivium plus Satellite, Cyborg, and Mixed-Corporate Media.
  • McLuhan’s letters to Ezra Pound — “I’ve wasted 20 years on English studies,” “the word is a drug” — and Cameron’s dating of the surrender of the literate point of view to around 1949–50.
  • The Android Meme dated as Ground from 1960 to 1990, the 1990s Internet as its afterimage, and its collapse and “flip into the Tech Body.”
  • Percepts versus concepts through the Richard Kostelanetz interview (“books create the effect of the concept”), and McLuhan’s late books read as the same ideas repackaged for different audiences.
  • Cameron’s foundation argument — McLuhan wrote Eric Voegelin that “everything is everything else,” so only a “level that holds,” reached through the maelstrom, escapes the search for a false foundation.

Notable Quotes

"It's not a sense. McLuhan defines it as interplay."
Bob Dobbsasserted#
Bob Dobbs, The Resonant Interval, Dialogue 43 (23 Dec 2021), 4:38
"He probed things in really interesting ways and opened up new ways of understanding the world. But he didn't figure out how to communicate it."
Cameron McEwenasserted#
Cameron McEwen, The Resonant Interval, Dialogue 43 (23 Dec 2021), 12:16
"If you want to find a foundation that holds, you have to go through the maelstrom."
Cameron McEwenasserted#
Cameron McEwen, The Resonant Interval, Dialogue 43 (23 Dec 2021), 1:14:14
"I think there's very, very great thinkers — Plato, Aristotle, Hegel, Heidegger. These are tremendous people, but I think that McLuhan may have a better chance of being communicable than they did."
Cameron McEwenasserted#
Cameron McEwen, The Resonant Interval, Dialogue 43 (23 Dec 2021), 1:17:52

Outline

  • 0:01:00 — Tactility, the Trivium, and the Quadrivium
  • 0:10:04 — Bob’s chart: the decades
  • 0:22:38 — The Android Meme: Ground and Afterimage
  • 0:26:39 — The last gasp of the individual
  • 0:37:12 — The Five Bodies
  • 0:44:22 — The maelstrom, percepts, and the repackaged books
  • 0:50:24 — P.80: the article’s neglect
  • 0:52:24 — The 1970s: the Tetrad, Hendiadys, and the Public Agent
  • 0:56:53 — Cameron’s digital McLuhan
  • 01:00:12 — Hendiadys, the Pentad, and the Archetype
  • 01:06:19 — Media as the unconscious
  • 01:09:02 — A new way to be a Christian
  • 01:16:01 — Communicating the solution
  • 01:38:16 — Tactility squared and the Tech Body

Mentioned Resources

Works by McLuhan

Other Works

People

  • Marshall McLuhan (Canadian media theorist at the center of the reading)
  • Ezra Pound (poet whose letters McLuhan answered; “a really important influence”)
  • Thomas Kuhn (Cameron’s Princeton professor, historian of scientific revolutions)
  • Eric McLuhan (Marshall’s son and collaborator on the chart of correspondences)
  • Jean Baudrillard (who called McLuhan “a musician”)
  • Richard Kostelanetz (the young critic McLuhan told “people need concepts to get a grip on reality”)
  • Howard Gossage (adman whose last-word-to-archetype pattern Bob adopts)
  • Wilfred Watson (McLuhan’s co-author on From Cliché to Archetype)
  • William Irwin Thompson (whose genealogy of the unconscious Bob completes with “the archetypes of media”)
  • Eric Voegelin (recipient of McLuhan’s 1953 “everything is everything else”)
  • Julian Assange (Cameron’s example of language with “zero meaning”)
  • Jordan Peterson (offered as the “pretty weak” contrast to McLuhan)
  • Mao Zedong, Henry Kissinger, Aldo Moro (the Little Red Book, the “tetrad manager,” the Vatican’s terrorist crisis)
  • Plato, Aristotle, Hegel, Heidegger (the “tremendous” thinkers McLuhan’s issues lead back to)

Closing

The session turns McLuhan’s own arc — from the Trivium to the Quadrivium to a communication he never solved — into the wager the two co-hosts are making: that the failure can be finished.


← Tactility Squared: Tools That Ape Us, the Maelstrom of Chaos and Tetrad Management, and Mind as the Fifth Victim · From Cliché to Archetype: Gossage’s Four Phases, the Musician McLuhan, and the Connubium of Outbreeding and Inbreeding →